Though the most recent model of Dune features a dazzling array of characters each main and minor, it makes a severe mistake in omitting Feyd-Rautha, the sinister nephew of Baron Harkonnen. Like his elder brother Glossu “Beast” Rabban, the youthful Harkonnen is a strong figure in his personal proper, and he is quite important to the novel’s narrative. It’s fairly surprising to seek out him absent from the entire first half of the two-part adaptation of Frank Herbert’s novel, leaving both his uncle and his brother to turn into the first antagonists and sources of conflict with the Atreides. Compelling as they may be, there’s no replacing a villain like Feyd.
After all, Feyd-Rautha makes notable appearances in different cinematic versions. Most notably, in David Lynch’s outlandish and controversial adaptation of Dune in 1984, he’s portrayed by Sting, who finally gave a performance that made the character extra camp than menacing. The character additionally makes a notable look in the miniseries produced by Syfy. Each time he appears, Feyd-Rautha is considered one of the main villains, often overshadowing his uncle and his brother. In Denis Villeneuve’s Dune 2, he’s slated to be performed by Austin Butler, fresh off his success in the blockbuster biopic Elvis, taking his place alongside Stellan Skarsgard’s Baron and Dave Bautista’s Beast Rabban.
RELATED: Dune 2 Is Going To Be Much Bigger Than The First (In 2 Ways)
Feyd-Rautha Is Key To Baron Harkonnen’s Plan From The Beginning
In Frank Herbert’s novel, Feyd-Rautha is a key part of Baron Harkonnen’s plan to regulate the Known Universe. He is cruel and sadistic like his uncle, but he’s far subtler than his elder brother Glossu “Beast” Rabban (Dave Bautista on this adaptation). Due to this, Baron Harkonnen hopes to distinction the 2 as rulers of Arrakis, which in turn will result in the residents of the desert planet seeing his younger nephew as their savior. Given the centrality of Feyd-Rautha to the Baron’s overall ambitions, it’s a mistake for the primary Dune to cut him totally. It stays as much as Part 2 to repair this error.
Thus, villainous though he might be, Dune’s highly effective Baron is also a canny political schemer. He recognizes the truth that he won’t be in a position to seize the place of Padishah Emperor for himself, which is why he invests so much of his energy in cultivating Feyd-Rautha for the facility that he someday wants him to wield. Herbert attracts consideration to how important Feyd-Rautha is to the stability of power throughout the Harkonnen household. Despite this, Feyd has no innate loyalty to his uncle, and it’s solely when he really attempts to assassinate the older man that the latter lastly reveals his plot to his nephew, maintaining his murderous impulses in examine long sufficient for them to work collectively.
Paul’s Dune 2 Story Could Be Weaker Without Feyd-Rautha Setup
In addition to being a key a half of the Baron’s nefarious plans all through Dune, Feyd-Rautha is also a foil to Paul from the start. Both are the scions of their houses, each bearing the heavy weight of expectation and nobility. In Feyd’s case, the novel makes clear simply how intent Feyd is on seizing as much energy as he can, irrespective of who he has to destroy so as to take action. In fact, Baron Harkonnen sees him as each a threat and a helpful gizmo for the family’s future, and much of the reader’s understanding of his character is filtered via the Baron’s observations very early within the story.
Dune 2 has to do a nice deal of work to introduce Feyd, establish his menace as a character, and demonstrate how opposed he is to Paul Atreides. This is numerous floor to cover for a single movie, even one which is bound to have a runtime as lengthy as Dune 2. It will also have to not solely proceed developing and elaborating most of the storylines from the first movie, it’s going to even have to indicate the viewer enough about Feyd so they can perceive his personal motivations as a character.
RELATED: Dune 2 Is A Big Denis Villeneuve First (& It Makes It More Exciting)
How Dune 2 Could Still Save Feyd-Rautha’s Story
Despite the chopping of Feyd-Rautha from Dune, there could be nonetheless a great deal of potential in his story. The actor taking half in Feyd-Rautha has already shown his formidable performing chops with Austin Butler’s efficiency in Elvis, which means he’ll show to be an apt and compelling foil for Timothée Chalamet’s Paul. It shall be quite fascinating to see these two individuals face off in opposition to one another, as they wrangle not just for control of Arrakis but also of the entire Known Universe. Their duel in particular will make sure to be a centerpiece of Dune 2, and it’ll enable every character to actually present the opposite how highly effective, and indomitable, they’re.
The first Dune is an epic in every sense of the word, with a sprawling story, highly effective performances from its forged, and particular results designed to immerse the viewer in the lovely and terrifying world of Arrakis. Given the fact that it only covers roughly the primary half of the original novel, it still manages to create a movie which is essentially satisfying in its personal right- controversy about adapting Dune aside.
In the sequel, viewers will get to see extra of the many political schemes that are a key characteristic of Frank Herbert’s universe. Feyd-Rautha and Paul both have essential roles to play, both on Arrakis and within the Known Universe itself, and their conflict with one another will attract no much less an individual than the Padishah Emperor himself. In this science fiction world, the spice should circulate, and lives shall be misplaced.
MORE: Why Dune 3 Is Even More Important Than Part 2
